The Olympics- which no one was looking forward to- have brought out a patriotic mob.

A week ago all the talk about the Olympics was about the massive cost, the G4s cock up, how it was being used as an excuse to take away our freedoms as police were given pre-emptive powers to take care of anyone they suspected and speech against the Olympics had been banned from some places (virtual places included), yet now we’re all excited and feeling the team GB love it seems we’re happy to give up our liberty.

Team GB missed out on a medal for synchronized diving so a disappointed fool tweeted national star Tom Daley telling him that he “let his dad down”. Daley then unwisely retweeted that to his army of followers who took it upon themselves to virtually lynch him. Plenty of abuse was sent both ways but now it’s Riley who is opening the door to the police and why? Because he wasn’t nice to someone everyone in this country loves right now.

If the police want to be consistent and fair they should be arresting everyone who sent Riley abuse but they’re not. If you search for “Riley” on Twitter you’’ find the top tweet- which has been retweeted well over four thousand times- is “Retweet if you would gladly punch Riley in the face right now”. Is that not a threat? Four thousand people have said they want to physically harm Riley which is clearly abusive so why aren’t any of these people facing punishment? Because they did it to someone nobody really likes right now.

Precedent has been set for police and the courts to interfere with Twitter as they’ve happily gone after racists (which is something I actually believe in) but here’s the difference: racists don’t have one victim because racism promotes inequality and prejudice in society. Eradicating racism doesn’t stop freedom, it sets minorities free. I also believe the police should go after bullies but only if they’ve been bullying someone harshly for a sustained period of time however, in the case of Riley it started off with one daft tweet and escalated. He’s a seventeen year old kid who has faced online abuse every time he updates his timeline and now has to deal with the police, does that seem like justice to you? Arresting him isn’t just a colossal waste of time; it’s a blow to our freedom and we’ve lost our dignity by setting the cops after a kid just because we’re getting into the spirit of the Games. It’s a shame as for the first time I was getting really patriotic but how we’ve acted has left a sour taste in my mouth.

What if Satan was good?

If the Bible is to believed then we all know Satan is supposed to be the ultimate bad guy, representing all of our sins and nasty/distasteful inclinations that we must constantly wage war with in an attempt to achieve moral superiority and get through those pearly gates once the time comes- but what if Satan wasn’t the villain?

God vs. Satan is the oldest good over evil tale that we all know but just for one moment let’s consider that it isn’t quite so simplistic. Let’s wipe the slate clean and look at one of the cornerstones of Christianity in a slightly different light.

What if Satan wasn’t trying to corrupt us all? He is supposed to be with us, trying to influence us to do the wrong thing and make us give into our character flaws and desires but that might not be an act of trying to tarnish us at all. Satan could pop up at our darkest moments to show that he’ll be there no matter what and that if we do commit an odious error he will still accept it and accept us. Think about it- Hell takes anyone Heaven rejects. All those that God doesn’t deem worthy are sent down to Hell but Satan accepts them all. There’s no discrimination down in his pit. Isn’t this a sign of compassion? A sign of equality? God is described as “wrathful”, “vengeful” and “jealous” and there are so many rules in his book that it’s hard to win his approval so Satan suddenly doesn’t look so bad in comparison; he’ll accept us all and love us no matter what. This doesn’t mean he’s necessarily endorsing sins if we go with this theory but that when our days are up he’ll forgive us. We’ll always have someone there.

I’ve been fairly biased in the way I’ve approached this argument but I just wondered whether the conventional character interpretations of these two were so clear cut. Committing a sin or a mistake can still be judged very harshly but maybe we need a little less absolutist thinking.

Gove: Ssh! Don’t say the s word!

If we don’t talk about…you know…then the kids won’t do it and if the kids don’t have…you know what…our teenage pregnancy rates will finally vanish and those nasty diseases will all go away. Brilliant idea! Labour never thought of that one. They just wanted to brainwash our children so they thought it was normal. Normal. The indecency of it all! It was just encouraging children to engage in that sort of behaviour. If the younglings don’t know about it then they can’t do anything about it so just don’t say…the word…you know which one…oh for God’s sake… s-e-x.

Reality.

Sorry to break this to you Gove but talking about doing the deed doesn’t lead to doing the deed any more than talking about the weather leads to rain. Pretending something isn’t happening doesn’t mean it magically disappears. It’s quite worrying that this is the man in charge of the next generation. It’s a good thing he isn’t in charge of the NHS; can you imagine his plan to beat cancer? Just don’t think about it and that tumour will disappear. Really, I guess we’re lucky in a way.

He is in charge of a section of our health though- reproductive and mental health of students thanks to his control over sex education and he seems intent on failing our teenagers. Sex education is vital and it should be built upon not demolished. It isn’t just about making sure teenagers have access to birth control and know what the different STDs they’re at risk of catching are if they have unprotected sex, but it’s also about making sure they know that what they’re feeling is normal- that it’s okay to be thinking about sex. Making sex a taboo subject won’t stop teenagers from experimenting or embarking upon relationships and the concept of a sex blackout is fairly inconceivable anyway when our media is obsessed by it. It’ll be our TVs he takes from people next then. It could be worse though, Dorries would have proposed only girls should be excluded from sex education.

Let’s talk about sex with our kids. Let’s talk about the emotions in relationships and the balance of power. Let’s discuss sexuality, sex and what it means and when you know you’re ready, contraception, the responsibility of having a baby, STD rates and what the different types of diseases and infections are. Let’s talk about all these things so that our students don’t feel alone, scared or that there’s something wrong with them. Let’s make sure they’re safe and prepared for when that time inevitably comes. There’s so much more to sex than just getting busy.  If we don’t pass on all of the information and support that we can then we’ve failed in our responsibilities. You can’t wish sex away Gove and all this plan will do is make more young people vulnerable.

My political problem

Who the hell am I supposed to vote for? That’s the question that has plagued me for a month now. I have absolutely no idea but I’m determined to work through it right now.

Sunderland has changed a lot in the last couple of decades (the regeneration, Nissan bringing plenty of new jobs, Sunderland being found to be the worst city for deaths caused by excessive alcohol intake and the city is a prime candidate for hosting a WRC event) so it’s easy to see why local elections are important. However, we’re still one of the most deprived areas in the country and that doesn’t look like changing any time soon. My votes are always swayed thanks to what is going on in a national level too- for instance, I was unlikely to vote Labour last time around thanks to a deep distrust of the government.

My voting slip came through the letter box yesterday and there are only four candidates to choose from- one from the Conservatives (surprisingly my local councillor is actually a Tory), a hopeful Liberal Democrat, a Labour candidate and an aspiring member from the Greens.

Just a year ago I was a devout Tory supporter and completely right wing but now I’m beginning to transform into a Marxist. I don’t hate the Conservatives but I don’t agree with a lot of what they stand for. I’m sick of hearing about how Christianity is under attack when it is the church that is denying equal rights based on sexual orientation, I don’t believe in the nuclear family, the Libertarian lot certainly aren’t for me as I don’t think anyone can get through life alone especially the poor and I detest what is happening with the NHS. Yet I struggled to really rule them out. At the General Elections (the first time I could vote) I remember being filled with so much hope and it was because of them. I still like Cameron- the NHS was more Lansley’s fault, he was strong on Libya, he’s good on the international stage, he’s sticking to the cuts whether rightly or wrongly and he’s the one who is trying to push gay marriage through. I don’t always agree with him but he was the one who first sold the Tories to me. It’s the truly Conservative ones behind him that really scare me. If I forget that last shred of loyalty though I know in my heart of hearts that this party can never deliver what I want now. I guess that’s a “no” for them.

I could go then for their partners. The Liberal Democrats are a nice, safe middle ground for the undecided or they used to be. I feel a bit sorry for Clegg; he made all of these promises thinking he would never have to deliver them all and now his party is shackled with the Tories who they fundamentally disagree with. His influence is limited but he has access to power so he’s finding he’s making all sorts of compromises he never dreamed of just to be able to sit on the nice bench. At a local level I imagine the Liberal Democrats will be separate from all that posturing and fighting and will just get on with the job. The problem is I’ve forgotten what they stand for. A tough call so I’ll make them a maybe.

Then there’s the usually safe Sunderland option- Labour. Out of all the parties on an ideological level I’m probably most aligned with them now however, if I struggled to dismiss my loyalty to the Conservatives I’m definitely finding it difficult to trust this team again. I grew up despising Labour. Sunderland did grow under them but compared to other cities we’re completely mistreated, underfinanced and underserved. Labour on a local level may be trusted but endorsing their party is just asking too much. As a whole, they did nothing in government for the north/south divide or for social mobility and that’s the one thing we really need. Too many of the familiar faces who got us into trouble still occupy comfortable positions in the party so they don’t get my vote- at least not yet.

My only remaining option- if I vote- then is the Greens. I don’t like their name. Whenever I’ve heard Caroline Lucas (who seems like a fantastic MP) I’ve always felt that there’s so much more to the party than the terror their name evokes of stealing our light bulbs and monitoring our recycling habits. Most people don’t like to have orders barked at them but that’s always what the word “green” used to mean to me but it doesn’t any more. I believe more needs to be done for the planet and that a green economy makes sense but I also believe in their other policies. They opposed rising tuition fees, they support the legalisation of cannabis, they want to tackle the “poverty trap”, it supports the EU but doesn’t want us to be all buddy buddy at the cost of giving up more of our autonomy and wants a reformed House of Lords (although I think the desire to reduce speed limits is barmy). The big downside is that they’re such an unknown that I have no idea what they’d do at a local level, the upside of that is that they’re the only choice that hasn’t screwed us over already. Voting for them would be a protest more than an endorsement.

After all of this then I guess I’ll plump for the Lib Dems. Or perhaps I’ll take a chance on Labour or the Greens. Or maybe I just won’t vote. I wish there was the option of “no vote” on the form so that the parties could see my disillusionment and work harder to win my trust. It’s interesting to note that so far I’ve only had one leaflet through the door and that was from Labour. At the last election there was a woman from Labour who came in her car with a megaphone attached and shouted up and down the street in a very annoying manner and the only other time that election was brought to my doorstep was when a leaflet landed from the Tories. No one from any political party has ever once knocked on my door despite the fact I’ve lived here since I was born twenty one years ago. Maybe if they put a little more effort into wooing the voters so many of us wouldn’t be disgruntled.

Why I won’t be watching the Bahrain Grand Prix.

For the week leading up to the 2009 Japanese Grand Prix I had caught a pretty bad bout of flu and I had ended up spending most of my nights waking up feeling sick to my stomach. The Friday practice sessions were held in the early hours of the morning so even though I was worn out and had a full day of uni ahead of me, I dutifully got up and watched every minute of the action (or lack thereof as it ended up raining quite heavily so the teams were reluctant to send their cars out). I then woke early on the Saturday and Sunday too despite having a busy weekend planned all so that I could watch the sport I love. It was crazy and on the Monday I was even more ill than when my bout of flu had been at its worst but I did it all because I loved the sport. I was an addict but now, unlike Bernie, you couldn’t pay me to be a part of the Bahrain Grand Prix.

I’m not just jumping on the bandwagon as I’ve followed (as much as I could) the events in Bahrain for over a year now. The world media has ignored the situation for far too long but it’s right that it is paying attention now when Bahrain has sought to make the race a political advert to boost its image. F1 and politics then are not separate and we are not separate. It may be happening miles away from us but that’s just pure luck. I’m so privileged that the worst that can happen to me is I get a moral nosebleed from all of this when the people in Bahrain are suffering human rights abuses at the hands of the state.

After all that I’ve heard and all that I’ve read I couldn’t possibly enjoy watching the race when I know that away from the track so many are being tortured, thousands arrested, tear gas is being used almost automatically, security forces are suppressing people even more thanks to F1 being in town and Abdulhadi al-Khawaja is on the brink of death (if he hasn’t died already), and at least one more protester has been killed and more than that, I’d feel like a hypocrite if I did watch it. I can’t demand that the teams stand up to the FIA and Bernie and go home if I’m not willing to forfeit the race either. The teams love F1 in a way that I never will be able to match; they live for it and their finances depend on it (their mechanics often earn their wages according to where their driver finishes) so how can I ask them to make the sacrifice if I’m not even willing to turn my TV off? The fact is I can’t. It wouldn’t be right. This isn’t about making a difference as I’ve lost any hope that Bernie gives a damn but that doesn’t mean that I should endorse the race which is what I will be doing if I watch. I’m not trying to convince anyone else not to watch- that’s up to you to decide what you feel comfortable with but this weekend I’m out.

Are we a good species?

Are we a good species? Given our intelligence have we achieved as much as we should have done? We produce our own food, have implemented trade systems and have invested in health care and education (in most parts of the word) yet, we’ve been blighted by war, HIV and AIDS spread at an alarming rate thanks to our initial inaction and our economy which we rely on so much is once again in trouble. But what should we be doing as a society of people? If you had to rate mankind on a scale of one to ten what would it be?

It is an incredibly simplified question given our geography and different social structures etc. but I just want to know what you think when you look around. How would you organise society? Should anything be changed at all?

What is the church so afraid of?

“I too hope in this short reign to be a man of peace.”

Pope Benedict XVI’s explanation of why he wanted to be named after Pope Benedict XV and yet during his time he’s waged war on homosexuality and as Cameron tries to make gay marriage legal the Catholic church’s position hasn’t softened one bit but what is the Pope, the Catholic Church and the Church of England (not forgetting other religions such as Islam who take a similar view) so afraid of? Continue reading

Why I can’t get worked up over the return of F1.

Usually the winter is a tortuous time for me because my beloved sport takes a hiatus until March. I eagerly await the start of a new season and get more worked up than if Christmas was coming (and I am one of those annoying people who adore Christmas). Today has brought with it the return of F1 and two practice sessions have already been held in Australia. I’m normally bursting with enthusiasm- but not this year. I love the racing more than ever and Sky looks to be fully invested on delivering the best F1 coverage there has ever been but the races before Bahrain (which is to be held on the 22nd of April) are completely being overshadowed for me while I wait for the F1 world to take some sort of stand this year. Continue reading

What’s your favourite book and why?

I was asked the other day what has impacted on my character and values the most (so far) and one thing sprang to mind: studying To Kill a Mockingbird as part of my English Literature GCSE. I’d always loved reading but I’d never had any faith in myself as someone who could understand books and I’d never found anything that had particularly influenced my mind (besides my parents) until I picked up that book. Continue reading